June 4, 2016
Thank you, John. Good morning, everyone.
I want to thank John, first of all, for inviting me to speak again this year, and IISS also for again bringing us together in this forum. For 15 years now – and by the way I attended the first Dialogue– IISS has been fostering the discussions and debates that have shaped the dynamic Asia-Pacific’s security, stability, and prosperity in this still young century. Thanks for doing so.
Thanks as well for the dinner last evening, which featured a thoughtful keynote by Thailand Prime Minister Prayut.
And I’d also like to thank our national host Singapore for welcoming us again this year. To prime minister and others, thank you. President Obama looks forward to hosting the prime minister in Washington in August. This nation where we are right now – and its incredible rise – is the quintessential example of the remarkable progress in this region over the past 70 years.
Miracle after miracle has occurred here…Japan, then Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore and Southeast Asia rose and prospered, and now, China and India and others are rising and prospering.
And continued progress is being made daily – by young innovators in Hanoi, and at technology companies in Mumbai; by the transition in Burma, and by avid consumers in China; the universities in Seoul, and in the bustling Strait of Malacca that I flew over yesterday.
There are many who share the credit for this success. This region’s proud, industrious citizens first and foremost. The statesmen in this region’s past, including the late Lee Kuan Yew, whom we continue to honor, and the many statesmen among you today. The policymakers, business leaders, military officials, scholars, and non-governmental leaders who’ve worked to make this region stable and prosperous. And, in addition to all these individuals, it’s also to the credit of shared principles – principles that have long been accepted and collectively upheld.
All that progress has led to historic change in the Asia-Pacific. Most of the change has been positive: country after country is seeking to play a greater role in regional affairs, and that’s for the good. But not all change in the region has been as constructive. Indeed, tensions in the South China Sea, North Korea’s continued nuclear and missile provocations, and the dangers of violent extremism felt worldwide, pose challenges to the region’s stability and prosperity.
And so as the region continues to change, forward-thinking statesmen and leaders must once again come together to ensure a positive and principled future…one where everybody, and every nation, continues to have the opportunity and freedom to rise, to prosper, and to win.
Thankfully, this room is full of such statesmen and leaders, and so is this region. And I want to talk with you all about how we can come together: how we can continue to build a principled security network that will allow additional waves of miracles and human progress and ensure regional stability and prosperity for years to come.
You may recall that at the end of my remarks last year, I projected conversations we might have at a future Shangri-La Dialogue. If we continue to cooperate on security, I posited, we would one day be discussing a U.S.-China-India multilateral maritime exercise, a Japan-Republic of Korea joint disaster response in the South China Sea, and an ASEAN-wide security network.
Over the last year, we’ve made progress toward that vision. China and India will both participate once again in the U.S.-hosted RIMPAC naval exercise this summer. Japan and the Republic of Korea are engaging with each other in new ways. And, through and in addition to the ASEAN-centric security network that’s developing in Southeast Asia, nations across the entire Asia-Pacific are increasingly working together – and networking security together.
By doing so, our nations are making a choice for a principled and inclusive future, one as bright and miraculous as the recent past. A future where every country – no matter how big or small – is free to make its own political, economic, and military choices, free from coercion and intimidation. Where disputes are resolved peacefully; and the freedoms of navigation and overflight, guaranteed by international law, are respected. And where, as a result, every person and every nation has the opportunity to rise and prosper and win.
We all have an interest in realizing that future. And a responsibility to bring it about. Now, unlike elsewhere in the world, peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific has never been managed by a region-wide, formal structure comparable to NATO in Europe. That’s made sense for this region, with its unique history, geography, and politics, and where bilateral relationships have long served as the bedrock of regional security.
And yet, as the region continues to change, and becomes more interconnected politically and economically, the region’s militaries are also coming together in new ways. They’re building connections for a common purpose: upholding the security and stability critical to a principled and prosperous future.
And these connections are now helping our countries plan together, exercise and train together, and operate together, more effectively and efficiently than ever before.
Now, this growing Asia-Pacific security network includes but is more than some extension of existing alliances. It weaves everyone’s relationships together – bilateral, trilateral, and multilateral – to help all of us do more, over greater distances, with greater economy of effort. It enables us to take coordinated action to respond to contingencies like humanitarian crises and disasters; to meet common challenges, such as terrorism; and to ensure the security of and equal access to the global and regional commons, including vital waterways. You can see this networked approach in our collective responses to Typhoon Haiyan in 2013 and the Nepal earthquake last year.
Most importantly, this is a principled security network. It is inclusive, since any nation and any military – no matter its capability, budget, or experience – can contribute. Everyone gets a voice, and no one is excluded, and hopefully, no one excludes themselves. And as this security network reflects the principles our countries have collectively promoted and upheld for decades, it will help us realize the principled future that many in the region have chosen, and are working together toward.
By expanding the reach of all and by responsibly sharing the security burden, this principled network represents the next wave in Asia-Pacific security.
And the United States is fully committed to this principled security network and to the Asia-Pacific’s principled future. That’s because this region, which is home to nearly half the world’s population and nearly half of the global economy, remains the most consequential for America’s own security and prosperity.
So even as the United States counters Russian aggression and coercion in Europe; as well as checks Iranian aggression and malign influence in the Middle East; and also accelerates ISIL’s certain defeat, America’s approach to the Asia-Pacific remains one of commitment, and strength, and inclusion.
Last Friday, I spoke with the newest class of American Navy and Marine Corps officers as they graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy. These are some of the finest young men and women America has to offer. And I explained to them that the United States has long and enduring diplomatic, economic, and security interests in the Asia-Pacific. And their role in it.
As a result, the United States has for decades contributed to the region’s diplomatic, economic, and security affairs, including during the many other times when some wrongly predicted an impending American withdrawal from the Asia-Pacific.
In fact, decade after decade – in the 1970s, the 1980s, the 1990s, and the 2000s – we’ve heard that the United States would cede its role as the primary security provider in the Asia-Pacific. And indeed, decade after decade – day in, and day out – American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines have worked here, most often with your nations, to help ensure this region’s security and uphold a common set of principles for all our countries to follow…so that every nation and everyone in this region could rise and prosper.
That’s been America’s objective and America’s practice for decades. Regardless of what else was going on at home or in other parts of the world – during Democratic and Republican administrations, in times of surplus and deficit, war and peace – the United States has remained economically, politically, and militarily engaged, as well as of course geographically located, in the Asia-Pacific. And as I told those new officers, they will be doing the same in the years ahead and over the course of their long careers.
That’s because U.S. engagement in the Asia-Pacific is in America’s interests. And the Congressional representation here today – including Chairman McCain, Senators Barrasso, Cotton, Ernst, Gardner, Graham, and Sullivan – demonstrates that America’s commitment to the region – and the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific in particular – is not transient. It is enduring. And that’s because the logic of, and the need for, and the value of American engagement in the Asia-Pacific is irrefutable. And it is proven over decades.
President Obama launched the rebalance to ensure the United States continued to approach this changing region with commitment, strength, and inclusion. Indeed, the rebalance is an affirmative investment in – and a U.S. Government-wide commitment to – the Asia-Pacific’s principled future.
Through the rebalance, the United States has reenergized our diplomacy in the region. Just look at the recent months. The president hosted the first-ever U.S. ASEAN Summit at Sunnylands. President Obama made historic visits to Vietnam and Japan just last week, his tenth trip to the region. I’m now on my fifth trip to the region – and it won’t be my last. And my colleague and friend John Brennan, our CIA Director, is also attending the Shangri-La Dialogue this weekend. Several of my Cabinet colleagues meanwhile will attend next week’s U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue. Prime Minister Modi will be in Washington next week, and Prime Minister Lee, as I said, will visit the next month. In other words, this is a busy month in a busy year but one that is representative of America’s increased attention and engagement in the region.
The United States is also strengthening economic ties with the region. For example, over the last seven years, U.S.-ASEAN trade has expanded by 55 percent. Since last year’s Shangri-La Dialogue, we’ve completed negotiations on the important Trans-Pacific Partnership deal, or TPP, which will bind the United States more closely together with 11 other economies, unlock economic opportunities for all of us, and guarantee a trade system of high standard.
And the Defense Department for our part is operationalizing its part of the rebalance, too – cementing it for the future. That means the United States will remain, for decades, the primary provider of regional security and a leading contributor to the region’s principled security network.
To do so, the Defense Department is continuing to send its best people – including some of those new Naval officers and Marines I spoke with last week – and also its most advanced capabilities to the Asia-Pacific. That includes F-22 and F-35 stealth fighter jets, P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft, continuous deployments of B-2 and B-52 bombers, and our newest surface warfare ships.
The Defense Department is also investing in new capabilities critical to the rebalance. We’re growing the number of surface ships and making each of them more capable, and we’re investing in Virginia-class submarines, new undersea drones, the new B-21 Long-Range Strike Bomber, as well as in areas like cyber, and electronic warfare, and space.
The Defense Department maintains its world-leading capabilities because the United States has made incomparable investments in it over decades. As a result, it will take decades or more for anyone to build the kind of military capability the United States possesses. This strength is not simply about dollar figures. We harness those dollars to America’s innovative and technological culture to develop revolutionary technologies. And that military edge is strengthened and honed in unrivaled and hard-earned operational experience over the past 15 years. No other military possesses this kind of skill and agility backed by this much experience.
The Defense Department is also developing innovative strategies, operational concepts. And the U.S. military is practicing these new ideas in training exercises, both on our own and with partners, none larger than this summer’s RIMPAC, which will bring together 27 countries for an opportunity to network.
As RIMPAC demonstrates, America’s defense relationships with allies and partners are the foundation of U.S. engagement in the Asia-Pacific, and those relationships are expanding, modernizing. While it would take me too long to go through every valuable partnership, you can see the breadth and depth of our bilateral efforts with some of the actions the United States and its allies and partners have taken just since last year’s Shangri-La Dialogue.
For example, the U.S.-Japan alliance remains the cornerstone of Asia-Pacific security. And with the new defense guidelines that Minister Nakatani and I signed last year, the U.S.-Japan alliance has never been stronger, or more capable of contributing to security around the region and beyond.
Similarly, the U.S.-Australia alliance is, more and more, a global one. As our two nations work together to uphold the freedom of navigation and overflight across this region, we’re also accelerating the defeat of ISIL together in Iraq and Syria.
America’s alliance with the Philippines is as close as it has been in decades. Through the new, landmark Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, or EDCA, the United States is supporting the modernization of the Philippine Armed Forces. EDCA provides the opportunity for American and Filipino military personnel to regularly train, exercise, and operate together, including through new joint maritime patrols.
Another developing partnership, the U.S.-India military relationship, is as close as it’s ever been. Through our strategic handshake – with the United States reaching west in its rebalance, and India reaching east in Prime Minister Modi’s Act East policy – our two nations are exercising together by air, land, and sea. And there’s also a technological handshake: we’re moving toward deeper and more diverse defense co-development and co-production, including on aircraft carrier design and construction. Minister Parrikar and I will identify new ways to cooperate in advance of Prime Minister Modi’s visit to Washington next week.
Meanwhile, President Obama’s historic visit to Hanoi last week was the latest demonstration of the dramatically-strengthened U.S.-Vietnam partnership. Thanks in part to the leadership of Senator McCain, who is present here today, the United States has lifted the ban on lethal weapons sales to Vietnam. Now Vietnam will have greater access to the military equipment it needs.
Finally, the U.S.-Singapore relationship continues to grow. Just yesterday, I flew over the Strait of Malacca with my counterpart Minister Ng in one of the American P-8 surveillance aircraft that’s now part of a rotational deployment here. That rotation is one of the many examples, including Singapore’s hosting four American littoral combat ships, of how our two countries are working together to build cooperation, provide security, and respond to crises in Southeast Asia.
And it’s reflective of a growing trend. Indeed, even as the United States will remain the most powerful military and main underwriter of security in the region for decades to come – and there should be no doubt about that – those growing bilateral relationships demonstrate that nations around the region are also committed to doing more to promote continued regional security and prosperity. That’s why the Asia-Pacific’s principled security network is growing.
And as the region changes and the rebalance is solidified, the United States is and will continue using its unique capabilities, experience, and influence to enhance the region’s security network – always contributing with commitment, strength, and inclusion.
For example, we’re moving out on the Maritime Security Initiative I announced at this dialogue last year. This initiative represents a $425-million-dollar, five-year, American commitment to multilateral security cooperation that aims to establish a maritime security network in Southeast Asia.
In the Initiative’s first year, the United States is helping the Philippines enhance its National Coast Watch Center and improving reconnaissance and maritime sensors; helping Vietnam train to develop future unmanned maritime capabilities; providing Indonesia and Malaysia with communications equipment and training; and working with Thailand on processing information at fusion centers.
More than simply providing money or hardware, the United States is helping these five countries connect with each other and develop a networked approach to regional challenges. Those capabilities, those connections, and that U.S. partnership will allow these countries to see more, share more, and do more to ensure maritime security throughout Southeast Asia.
This initiative demonstrates the promise of a principled security network – nations building connections for a common cause, planning and training together, and eventually operating in a coordinated way. Throughout the Asia-Pacific, more and more nations are similarly coming together in three key ways.
First, some pioneering trilateral mechanisms are bringing together like-minded allies and partners to maximize individual contributions and connect nations that previously worked together only bilaterally.
For example, the U.S.-Japan-Republic of Korea trilateral partnership helps us coordinate responses to North Korean provocations. And I’m pleased to announce that the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea will conduct a trilateral ballistic missile warning exercise later this month.
And two other trilateral relationships – U.S.-Japan-Australia and U.S.-Japan-India – are also growing thanks, in part to exercises. We’ve agreed to hold, and begun planning on, additional U.S.-Japan-Australia trilateral exercises. And through joint activities like this year’s MALABAR Exercise, the U.S.-Japan-India trilateral relationship is starting to provide real, practical security cooperation that spans the entire region from the Indian Ocean to the Western Pacific.
We’re also seeing trilateral cooperation around other initiatives. For example, the United States and Thailand included Laos in a successful bilateral program, and now our three nations are training together on explosive ordnance disposal.
Second – and moving beyond trilateral relationships involving the United States – many countries within the Asia-Pacific are coming together on their own: strengthening and developing bilateral relationships, and also creating trilateral arrangements.
Japan and Vietnam, for example, are collaborating on new joint maritime exercises. Japan is also working to build the capacity of the Philippine maritime forces. And India is increasing its training with Vietnam’s military and coast guard on their common platforms.
The Japan-Australia-India trilateral meeting last June was a welcome development and addition to the region’s security network. And Indonesia has proposed trilateral joint maritime patrols with Malaysia and the Philippines, including counter-piracy patrols in the Sulu Sea. The United States welcomes and encourages…encourages these burgeoning partnerships among like-minded partners who share our vision of a principled regional order.
Third and even more broadly, all of our nations are creating a networked, multilateral regional security architecture – from one end of the region to the other – through the ASEAN Defense Ministers Meeting-Plus. At Sunnylands in February, ASEAN demonstrated again why it is a model for the principled future we all want for the Asia-Pacific. In the summit declaration, the region committed to maintaining peace, security, and stability and to upholding shared principles in the region, including the freedom of navigation and overflight.
ADMM-Plus fills the growing need for an action-oriented, ASEAN-centric regional institution that builds trust, facilitates practical multilateral security cooperation, and brings the region together to meet these commitments. I want to thank Laos for its leadership of ADMM-Plus this year.
And I’m pleased to announce that in September, the United States and Laos will co-host an informal defense ministers’ dialogue in Hawaii, with all of the ASEAN countries, to follow-up on Sunnylands commitments, discuss common interests, and find new ways to network regional security.
As we weave these bilateral, trilateral, and multilateral relationships together, it’s important to remember that this principled network is not aimed at any particular country: it is open and excludes no one. This means that as nations want to contribute to regional stability and security, they can work together with other nations in the network to do so.
The United States welcomes the emergence of a peaceful, stable, and prosperous China that plays a responsible role in the region’s principled security network. We know China’s inclusion makes for a stronger network and a more stable, secure, and prosperous region.
In all of our interactions with our Chinese counterparts, the United States consistently encourages China to take actions that uphold – and do not undercut – the shared principles that have served so many in Asia-Pacific so well.
The region will be stronger, safer, and more prosperous when all countries are working toward a common vision in which shared principles are upheld, all countries enjoy equal treatment irrespective of their size or strength, and disputes are resolved peacefully and lawfully.
Unfortunately, there is growing anxiety in this region, and in this room, about China’s activities on the seas, in cyberspace, and in the region’s airspace. Indeed, in the South China Sea, China has taken some expansive and unprecedented actions that have generated concerns about China’s strategic intentions.
And countries across the region have been taking action and voicing concerns publicly and privately, at the highest levels, in regional meetings, and global fora. As a result, China’s actions in the South China Sea are isolating it, at a time when the entire region is coming together and networking. Unfortunately, if these actions continue, China could end up erecting a Great Wall of self-isolation.
Now, the United States is not a claimant in the current disputes in the South China Sea. And we do not take a position on which claimant has the superior sovereignty claim over the disputed land features.
But, the United States will stand with regional partners to uphold core principles, like freedom of navigation and overflight, and the peaceful resolution of disputes through legal means and in accordance with international law.
As I affirmed here last year and America’s Freedom of Navigation Operations in the South China Sea have demonstrated, the United States will continue to fly, sail, and operate wherever international law allows, so that everyone in the region can do the same.
And the United States will work with all Asia-Pacific nations to ensure these core principles apply just as equally in the vital South China Sea as they do everywhere else. Because only when everyone plays by the same rules can we avoid the mistakes of the past, like when countries challenged one another in contests of strength and will, with disastrous consequences for the region.
The United States views the upcoming ruling by the UN Arbitral Tribunal on the South China Sea as an opportunity for China and the rest of the region to recommit to a principled future, to renewed diplomacy, and to lowering tensions, rather than raising them. All of us should come together to ensure that this opportunity is realized.
The United States remains committed to working with China to ensure a principled future. Our two countries have a long-standing military-to-military relationship. We recently completed two confidence-building measures, one on maritime rules of behavior and another on crisis communications. The regular U.S.-China Military Maritime Consultative Agreement talks were just held in Hawaii. And China will also be back at RIMPAC this year. In fact, the United States and China plan to sail together from Guam to Hawaii for RIMPAC, conducting several exercise events along the way, including an event to practice search-and-rescue.
And the United States wants to strengthen those ties. I plan, at President Xi’s invitation, to discuss this deeper cooperation as well as the concerns I’ve outlined here, when I travel to Beijing later this year. America wants to expand military-to-military agreements with China to focus not only on risk reduction, but also on practical cooperation. Our two militaries can all also work together, bilaterally or as part of the principled security network, to meet a number of challenges – like terrorism and piracy – in the Asia-Pacific and around the world.
After all, both our nations share so many interests. And we face many of the same global challenges. The United States expects and welcomes a China that plays a responsible role in world affairs commensurate with its wealth and potential influence. Together in a network represented by all the delegates in this room, we all can do so much. And the United States wants to work with China to find solutions for the global problems we’re both facing and seize the many opportunities before us.
By networking security together, the United States, China, and all others in the region can continue to ensure stability and prosperity in a dynamic region. We can become more interconnected; we can develop greater interoperability; we can innovate together on shared capabilities. And we can continue to ensure that this region’s historic change becomes historic progress…giving everyone and every nation in the Asia-Pacific the opportunity to rise and prosper and win.
Through a principled security network, we can all meet the challenges we’re facing together – whether it’s Russia’s worrying actions, North Korea’s nuclear and missile provocations, the threat posed by extremists groups, or the growing strategic impact of climate change. These challenges and others are real for all of us who live in the Asia-Pacific. But so are the opportunities: for nations, for militaries, and for the people of the Asia-Pacific. Across the region, there are economic miracles still to occur, military relationships still to strengthen, and populations still to educate, empower, and enrich.
To realize these opportunities, the Asia-Pacific will need continued stability and security. It is said of this region, that security is like oxygen. When you have enough of it, you pay no attention to it. But when you don’t have enough, you can think of nothing else.
For many years, the United States – along with its allies and partners – helped provide oxygen in this it. But by networking regional security together, we can all contribute more, and in different ways. In the years ahead, as we continue to realize this brighter, principled future, providing the region’s oxygen will more and more become a networked effort.
Through the region’s principled security network, all of us will provide that oxygen – Americans and Filipinos, Chinese and Indians, Singaporeans and Japanese, Australians and Malaysians, Koreans and Kiwis, and many, many more. Together, we will provide the security that enables millions upon millions of people all around the Asia-Pacific to continue to rise and prosper, to be safe, to raise their children, dream their dreams, and live lives that are full.
At a time of great change in this region, and in many of our home countries, all of us must defend the security, stability, and principles that have meant so much to the Asia-Pacific. To do so, we may change how we network, how we plan, and how we operate. But we can never change why we’re networking, and what we’re networking for: for our security and shared interests…for the principles that have benefited so many for so long…and for that principled future where everyone can continue to rise and prosper.
That is the future many of us in this room spend our days working toward. I thank you for that dedication. But we’re not finished yet. We have work still to do. And I look forward to collaborating, and networking, with each of you – in the days, weeks, and years ahead – to realize this region’s principled future.
Thank you.
MR. JOHN CHIPMAN: Thank you very much for that description of the bilateral and multilateral relationships that the United States endures in this region. A reminder perhaps that the rebalance to Asia is also very importantly a rebalance within Asia. There are a number of people who've asked for the floor. Just a reminder, please put your chip card in, press the button, the green light will light, and that will show that you are on my list. I will take questions in groups of two to make certain that we maintain a dynamic peace here.
And the first question from India, Dr. Sanjaya Baru
Q: Thank you, John.
Secretary Carter, you said in your presentation that before -- ahead of Prime Minister Modi's visit to Washington D.C. later next week you plan to enter into a new partnership agreements with your counterpart, Minister Parrikar. Would you care to elaborate what these new partnerships (inaudible)?
SEC. CARTER: Sure, I'll describe them generally, but I also want to leave room for Mr. Parrikar and I to finalize them and also obviously Prime Minister Modi and President Obama to discuss them and finalize them.
But the idea is this. The United States and India are committed as part of our growing security partnership to co-development and co-production of military capabilities. That is something we have not had for -- since really the birth of the modern Indian state. We had two systems that grew up apart, and we're trying to bring them together, and that'll be a very productive thing to do. We have a large number of projects that we're working on for which -- in which we'll be developing and being launched in the coming months. I'm mention a few. It is the aircraft carrier. Work and I had the privilege of going out to Goa with Prime Minster Parrikar a few months ago and being on one of their aircraft carriers out there, which was superb. They're committed to (inaudible) their fleet.
Another thing the United States is working on very hard on its side is changing India's status in the U.S. export internal system, which is also somewhat outdated and goes back to a previous era. Our laboratories are working together in a host of joint research and development projects on technologies of military importance.
And so there are many, many things that we're doing together, and I think the point is at -- for the -- for Prime Minster Modi's (inaudible) in India policy and our technology policies to come together in the same way that the rebalance and Act East come together when they call it a handshake. So there's a lot going on, and there will be a lot more developing in the coming weeks and months.
MR. JOHN CHIPMAN: Thank you. And from the U.S. Kwame Glazer.
Q: Thank you, Secretary Carter.
A few months ago back in March CNO Admiral Richardson said that there was signs that China might begin dredging on Scarborough Shoal. Of course it's uncertain whether or not China will proceed will proceed with the claimed land, but is a concern that I have, and I'm sure that you sure. What can the United States do in corroboration with the region to prevent this? Are we prepared to respond.
And how would you assess the challenges posted if China builds another outpost on Scarborough Shoal, which is only 120 miles from the Philippine Naval island of (inaudible)? Thank you.
SEC. CARTER: Okay, thank you. And by the way, Admiral Richardson is here. (inaudible).
Well, an action of that sort would be provocative and destabilizing. And the -- for China self isolating. As far as the United States is concerned we will continue to fly sail and operate where international law permits. As far as the region is concerned, Bonnie, and I think this is important. There are many regional countries that are reacting to the potential for the South China Sea to -- for action there to become to provocative and destabilizing. Many of them are therefore coming work more strongly with us, and of course we welcome them as part of network. And so I just say that hope that I -- this development doesn't occur because it will result in actions being taken both by the United States and by actions taken by others in the region which will have the effect of not only increasing tensions, but isolating China, which is, as I said in my speech, not what the United States stands for or wants.
MR. CHIPMAN: And from Japan, (inaudible). Thank you.
Q: Thank you. (inaudible) Japan.
Secretary Carter, you talked about the United States as (inaudible) primary provider in the region. And also (inaudible) principal security network. These are reassuring for allies like Japan, and also (inaudible).
But the question is, how to implement? And I think the biggest challenge would be, just as you pointed out, the self isolation of China. How -- and this self isolation is no accident. It is based on their (inaudible).
My question is, how can you -- how can the United States, (inaudible), change this kind of strategic operaton of China? You talked about the deployment of (inaudible), but does the demonstration of superior airpower suffice? Thank you very much.
SEC. CARTER: Well, I can't speak for my Chinese colleagues in that regard. But there's a big opportunity upcoming in the tribunal for everyone in the region, all claimants (inaudible). In that respect I wouldn't single out China. They're claimants as well.
To adhere by the ruling of the tribunal that is a great opportunity for the countries in the region to show respect for principal and international law, and for -- to avoid self isolation on the part of any party. So that's very important.
MR. CHIPMAN: And from Indonesia, doctor -- I'll go back to the U.S. Josh Rogen.
Q: Thank you very much. Secretary Carter, in 2006 you wrote an article with Defense Secretary William Perry advocating for the possible strike on North Korean missile technology to prevent them from acquiring long-range capability to hit the United States (inaudible). Ten years later North Korea's nuclear program, missile program and amassing of nuclear (inaudible) continues apace. How would you grade on a scale of A to F the world's and the Obama administration's policy of deterring North Korea nuclear progress, and will you do anything, will the Obama administration do anything in its final hours on its policy? And do you agree with secretary, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, that the time has come for more intensive pressure including pressure ) on China, including (inaudible) sanctions for supporting (inaudible)?
SEC. CARTER: Thanks. Well, I'm not sure I can grade the allies in the region. It's easy to grade the North Koreans with a low grade.
(inaudible) because the actions they've taken, and continue to take, are provocative. They violate U.N. Security Council resolutions, and so they've been condemned by the entire world. We've worked closely with our allies there, South Korea and Japan, who are also threatened in this way, and (inaudible) China and Russia to try to persuade North Korea to halt its progress in this area and abide by the agreement it made long ago for a nuclear free Korean peninsula, but it's hard to grade them very high on any of those ambitions.
Meanwhile we, just to get your question about what -- we continue to stand strong every single day on the Korean peninsula. They're American troops there. We continue to improve their capabilities, of the forces of South Korea, and continue to prove in their capabilities, and our alliance and the way it operates the command and control, the operational plans and so forth of the alliance continue to evolve and improve so that deterrents remains extremely strong. In respect to ballistic missiles, which is one of the things you've mentioned, we and Japan and South Korea take measures to protect our own people, our forces deployed there and the region for ballistic missile attack. We're making improvements in that system all of the time, and so both with respect to deterrents and defense from missile attack, we're taking strong actions within both of those alliances.
MR. CHIPMAN: From China professor Jiam Jianbo.
Q: Well, thank you very much Secretary Carter for you clear and systematic presentation of U.S. position. I just think that the dispute between China and the U.S. over the South China Sea has been overblown. It is only part of the relationship, between our two countries, which is you know, a huge vast and complicated. So I think this issue probably should be put in proper perspective. Secondly I think the artificial islands China used, China's practice is not an exception. I think a lot of countries have engaged in this kind of practice, including Vietnam, Philippines, even Japan South Korea.
So why focus on China?
Also the right to -- at what difference between China and U.S. orderedfreedom of navigation on the high seas. I think both China and the U.S. are committed to this principal. However there is one difference, That is China believes that, you know, this does not give the right to military -- to other countries to (inaudible) military in the sales of (inaudible) ships and (inaudible) close to the other country's coast. Even though it's in high seas. But the U.S. believes that it is important to maintain this right. That's the difference between China and the U.S. (inaudible) freedom of navigation of the high seas.
Why -- my question is why U.S. (inaudible) is so much (inaudible) to the right, to send ships and aircraft to, you know, (inaudible) activities near our country's coast. Why is it so important, could you explainThank you very much.
SEC. CARTER: Yes, it's -- what we stand for is the principal of rule of law and abiding by international law in the commons. Which means freedom of navigation in the sea and the air. That is what we're standing for. It's not a focus on China; it's a focus on principle. And you're right, China is not the only country that has taken actions. And the United States, as I said before, doesn't take an action -- doesn't take a side in the disputes themselves over sovereignty, but it does take a side on principle, meaning peaceful resolution of these disputes through diplomacy. And freedom of the commons. So it's principle that we side with, not a dispute between the United States and China, it's a question of principle.
The reason that people are focusing on China this year is because China is doing by far and away more of this reclamation and militarization than any other party. That's the reason why the parties in the region are concerned about principle focusing on China. It's China's actions that are causing that attention, but the attention is occasioned by a concern over the principles of peaceful resolution of disputes, not coercion, and freedom, which are core principles to everyone in the region.
By the way, there are core principles around the world. That are important ones to stand for. And I would say finally that in the connection of perspective I would say that the -- from a global perspective, from a regional perspective and from a principled perspective, these actions by anyone, especially by China over the last couple of years are destabilizing. And as I indicated earlier, self-isolating, which is regrettable, since our vision, the American vision for security for this region, as I indicated is one of inclusive security.
Q: Yes sir, Secretary Carter, first of all thank you for extremely thought-provoking speech. By the latest count you use the word "principle" 37 times -- (Laughter) -- (inaudible) That of course did not happen by chance. My question is the following.
Former Secretary of State James Baker was asked fairly recently by Lionel Barber of the Financial Times whether American and its institutions are strong enough to survive any shock, even one as cataclysmic as Donald Trump in the White House. James Baker answers, "Yes. I won't get my panties in a wedge because of what I'm hearing from the political pundits. I don't care who wins. Whoever gets to the White House - presidents can do a lot but they can only do so much with the system of checks and balances. We are a country of laws, limited by bureaucracy and the power structure in Washington."
Would you care to comment?
SEC. CARTER: Well, I'm not going to comment for the following reason. The answer is there's an election going on in the United States. We have a longstanding practice and tradition from the 38th principle -- (Laughter) -- that our department, our military, our security leaders stand apart from the electoral process. So I'm extremely careful not to comment on the election or the observations by any one candidate. So I'm sorry I can't do that.
Q: Thank you, Secretary Carter, for your speech. As much earlier, we talk a lot about the notion of a peaceful rule and original order, if we are to avoid having G-2 to U.S.-China original order, how then do we put ASEAN at the table when we discuss what sort of principles we should abide by and how to enforce them? Thank you.
MR. CHIPMAN: And before the secretary answers that I'll take one more and final question from Russia and Katrina Ordinova.
Q: Thank you chairman. Secretary, I would like to ask what role you see for Russia in the network of security in the region. Is it also (inaudible) a country like China, or is it a threat, or is it partner (inaudible) new direction indicate?
SEC. CARTER: Thank you. First of all, with respect to the first question, there was a reference to a G-2. That is not the American approach. It's not - we once had good relations and expect to have good military relations with China. But while we have military relations with other countries in the region we want China to have like others. So this is a system that we envision that is not, that doesn't exclude anyone, certainly not all the countries except the United States and China. We want it to be inclusive, and region-wide.
So that's not our approach at all.
With respect to Russia, you know Russia is also a Pacific power, and can play a role in the Asia-Pacific. We obviously have concerns with Russia's conduct both in Europe and to some extent, although we hope for better in this regard, in the Middle East. But with respect to their contribution in this region, I think in principle they could do a lot more. The United States would welcome, as we would welcome any partners, in the network. And to show that that's possible I would just point to something you raised which is Russia's role in dealing with North Korea nuclear and ballistic missile provocation.
Russia has stood strong with China, the United States as well as with Korea and Japan, for now a number of years in that regard. To try to use it's influence in a constructive way. Where it uses its influence in that way we're very pleased to work with Russia. So I think the potential's there. It hasn't been realized yet, but the answer to your question can Russia be part of the principled security network of Asia, yes I certainly hope it would be.
MR. CHIPMAN: Secretary Carter thank you very much. As several people are still seeking the floor and I'm sorry I can't invite you to address the secretary but I've got you in mind for subsequent sessions.
Let me thank the Secretary for an excellent opening statement for this Shangri La Dialogue that I think has set an excellent tone for our discussions. Please will you join me...
-END-